What's So Bad About Sex, Nudity And Fantasies (In Entertainment)?
Sex
sells, and everyone knows it. Authors, film producers, comic book
artists and game developers all know that images (even mental images)
of attractive (usually female)
bodies will attract people to whatever content is being created. It
may not involve nudity or be defined as “pornography”, but it's
still content created to stimulate sexual lust. And in the privacy of
our homes we can fixate on this kind of content, and in the case of
games even manipulate and interact with it.
We
might ask the question, who is it harming if we enjoy this kind of
content? Why would God want us to deprive ourselves of this private
pleasure? Does the Bible really say anything about this kind of
stuff?
Let
me first say that I'm not bringing this topic up as a guy who has
figured it all out and mastered this area of his life. I am an
inconsistent mess of a person and if you could see my heart you'd be
disgusted. So I'm sharing this as a guy who needs repeated, daily
rescue from my selfishness, and who needs the relentless love and
forgiveness that Jesus tirelessly offers.
My
aim here is to refresh my mind on what the Bible says that
can be helpful in this area. And I'm inviting you to be a part of
that with me.
Well,
let's get the basics out of the way first.
Matthew
5:28 “But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with
lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
This
comes in the middle of Jesus' teaching on the heart, and how God
doesn't just care about our actions. He cares about our thoughts. He
doesn't just want our behavior to change. He wants to change who we
naturally are in our inmost, truest being. He
wants us to become increasingly better at loving and valuing other
people. And
desiring a person only for their body devalues them.
Now
let's say we wanted to try and squirm our way out of this one. We
could get super-literal and say Matthew 5:28 doesn't apply to images
that aren't really women, such as artistic representations in comics
or video games. And based on that logic you could argue that
pornography is really just a collection of pixels that we lust after,
and not an actual woman.
But
this just leads down an absurd rabbit hole where we can start
claiming that in looking at a woman in the room with us we are
actually not looking at HER, but simply an organization of colors
being reflected off her clothes and body. But I don't think any
scholar of the New Testament time period will tell you that Jesus
would have had that kind of interpretation in mind. He spoke in
normal language for the normal people of the day. Not in language
intended for review in a future scientific journal.
Even
so, I'd argue that the heart of this command is about loving and
valuing others. And fixating on someone's physical form and seeing it
as a mere tool or object for our gratification is selfish rather than
selfless.
Because
of this, I don’t see how one could argue that nudity and sexualized
images of women do not involve varying yet significant risk of
temptation to sin for most if
not all men.
People
will have various degrees of sensitivity and triggers for temptation.
We shouldn't assume that others have the same degree of strength or
weakness against a given trigger or temptation. It's largely
something that can only be monitored on a personal, individual basis.
Of course this also makes it really easy for each of us to simply put
up a smokescreen and defend our image before others, not admitting
that something we're engaging in IS causing us to sin. And we can
sure play that game for as long as we want. But the long-term effects
of engaging in sexual sin, even briefly, and even though it may be a
purely secret
mental activity, will be felt by those around us, especially our
spouses. Even our future spouses.
In
her article titled “The Impact of Pornography on Marital Sex”,
Dr. Juli Slattery says “In
many marriages, the husband isn't interested in sex with his wife
because he has been programmed to respond to a much higher level of
erotic stimulation.”
She cites a study on pornography addiction which revealed “With
the passage of time, the addicted person required rougher, more
explicit, more deviant, and "kinky" kinds of sexual
material to get their "highs" and "sexual turn-ons."
She
goes on to say that pornography “allows a man to have sex on his
terms. Porn is always available, never too busy, and always inviting.
It doesn't criticize, doesn't require foreplay or patience, isn't
dependent on "feeling close," and never has a headache.
When a guy is engaged in this type of sexual outlet, his sexuality
becomes centered on his immediate needs and demands. The prospect of
working through the messy issues of marital intimacy is pretty
unattractive.”
I
can say from experience that, although the material was not what we
would define as “pornography”, increased exposure to sexualized
content has made me a more selfish, frustrated and unsatisfied
husband, and decreasing or removing those kinds of experiences from
my life has greatly...improved...stuff. (Okay, I've got a wife to
think about so I can't be more specific than that.)
Bottom
line: Sexualized content= sexual frustration and dissatisfaction.
Even engaging in that content before marriage and quitting once you
say “I Do” will leave you with images and ideas that will hurt
your experiences with your spouse.
And
those are just the selfish reasons to avoid sexual temptation
triggers. The better reasons are found in scripture.
Mark
12:30-31 And
you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all
your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’
The
second is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There
is no other commandment greater than these.”
The
Greek word used for “love” here and elsewhere in the New
Testament is defined by a selfless regard for others and what is best
for them.
Engaging
privately and mentally in lust is not victimless. Avoiding sexual
temptation triggers is part of loving others, because it helps keep
us from viewing others as a means to our gratification. We can't see
people as mere sex objects if we are choosing to value them the way
we want to be valued.
This
may be a controversial statement, but I believe that anyone who wants
to be appreciated only for their body and their ability to sexually
gratify someone else is emotionally and mentally unhealthy in some
way. No one, “in their right mind”, wants to be unloved for who
they are and only desired for their body.
While
sexualized entertainment should certainly be a big red flag, we
should take note of anything that contributes to having that
objectifying mentality and stay away from it.
Speaking
for myself, I
do fine with self-deprecating sexual humor that acknowledges some of
the awkward elements that can be involved in the sexual experience.
But I've
noticed that the more I'm exposed to most types of macho
“locker
room” sexual humor, the more I tend to think of my wife as being
intended to satisfy me, and the more I think of her as falling short
in that department. And of course I've also found this pattern to be
true the more exposed I am to movies and photos with sexualized
portrayals of women.
The
same principle can and should be applied to other things in life that
may lead us into a selfish mentality that objectifies or creates
unfair expectations of others. Since many women are not nearly as
visually oriented as men when it comes to sex, I asked my wife what
things in entertainment she found could put her in a mindset that
objectifies me.
She
pointed to stories in which a man is an idealized romantic, who
frequently or cleverly surprises his lady
with unique and creative expressions of affection. And my wife is not
alone in this. Many women can find themselves fixating on an ideal
type of man presented in fiction, who devotedly serves their every
whim or has some other appealing characteristic. These same women
then become frustrated when the man in their life doesn't match up to
the fiction.
So
whether your heart flutters for one of the Avengers, or that romance
questline in Mass Effect is a big motivator for playing, geeks have
plenty of reasons to ask ourselves some hard and thoughtful
questions. Maybe we find it easy to identify and divorce ourselves
from sexual/romantic content that is obviously bad for us. But
another test worth taking is asking ourselves what we expect from a
present or future girlfriend, boyfriend or spouse, and where we
picked up those expectations.
Make
no mistake, doing what we can to increase our physical appeal for our
present or future spouse is a good thing. Being creatively romantic
and serving our spouse is a good thing. The Bible itself presents
physical and relational enjoyment of our spouse as an ideal in The
Song Of Solomon. But we sin when we begin feeling entitled to the
ideal and seeing the opposite sex as a means of our gratification.
And so we ought to guard ourselves against content that puts our
minds in the wrong place.
Maybe
breaking out of those habits seems so monumental a task that the
effort would just be a waste of time. But
people rarely change overnight. And yet we can choose to take some
small step in a better direction today, even if we screw it all up
again tomorrow.
I
think it's vital
to remember
the tireless, relentless love and forgiveness of Jesus, who doesn't
love us any less for our unceasing failures. Who washes our record
clean, replacing it with his own, and who makes every moment a fresh
one in which we can choose, at least in that one instance, to trust
God enough to do life his way.
Excellent post, Paeter.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Rhoetus! Tough, awkward topic! -Paeter
ReplyDeleteWow, this is very well done. This gives some really good food for thought and a healthy dose of reality for those like me who deal with weakness in this area. I enjoyed the scripture references mixed with the medical studies and personal testimonies. I think every man who desires to be honoring to his current or future wife should consider these things.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Tim. Glad it was useful! Now if only I can REMEMBER these things as well as I can type them up! :-) -Paeter
Delete